USFS: Eliminate senior, disabled camp discounts


Published on Tuesday, December 8, 2009 10:19 PM PST

Cathy Perfect
Kern Valley Sun

The U.S. Forest Service has announced its plans to eliminate a 50 percent discount, traditionally available to holders of lifetime Senior and Access (permanently disabled) passes, at National Forest campgrounds.

The change will apply to concession-run campgrounds, representing 50 percent of National Forest camping capacity and 82 percent of reservable campsites.

In a notice in the Dec. 1 Federal Register, the agency outlined a new policy that would replace the half-price rule, a directive that has been in place since the mid-’60s, with a 10 percent discount. The policy would also require Senior and Access passholders to pay a fee at National Forest day-use sites that are currently covered in full by their passes.

“The bottom line is, it’s hurting their bottom lines,” said Western Slope No-Fee Coalition President Kitty Benzar.

Under current policy, concessioners are required to honor Senior and Access passes for campground fees under the same terms as if the Forest Service operated the facility directly, meaning that a 50 percent discount must be offered. Most highly-developed campgrounds are now concessioner-run.

“If the US Forest Service could account for the billions of dollars they are already receiving from the American taxpayer, they wouldn't need to target seniors and the disabled in this way,” remarked Peter Wiechers of Kernville.

The concessioner program has expanded during the past 30 years, moving away from a small ‘mom-and-pop’ business model to one predominately run a few large corporations, said Benzar.

Camping and outdoor enthusiasts throughout the country have voiced concern about the proposed changes. “It’s probably a little unfair for the seniors and disabled who are on fixed incomes,” said Oregon camper Lona Kutcher.

“I think it’s wrong in these economic times for people to be taking discounts away,” said Cole Champman, an RV dealer.

The change is possible because of changes in the laws that authorize recreation fees on public lands. Until 2005 such fees were governed by the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965. That law established the Golden Age and Golden Access passes, entitling the holder to lifetime free entry to National Parks and giving a 50 percent discount on federal camping fees.

In 2005, the new Recreation Enhancement Act took effect, replacing the previous authority. Under REA, lifetime passes are still offered, but the 50 percent camping discount is no longer required. The Forest Service had, until now, continued the discount as a matter of policy and had required concessioners to do so as a condition of their operating permits, Benzar said.

The REA specifies that pre-existing holders of Golden Age and Golden Access passes can continue to use them in accordance with the terms under which they were issued “to the extent practicable.” That means they should be grandfathered-in for the 50 percent discount as long as the pass is not lost or stolen, noted Benzar.

“The Forest Service is not showing good faith by changing the terms of the passes after the fact,” said Benzar. “They encouraged people to turn in their Golden passes, which guaranteed a 50 percent camping discount, in exchange for an REA pass which does not, without telling them that they were giving up an important benefit. If they can’t find a practical way to distinguish between the two types of passes, the only fair thing to do is to continue to offer the 50 percent discount to both groups,” said Benzar.

“The change is the latest in a long series of policy decisions that have transformed recreation on public lands from a public benefit into a market commodity,” Benzar said.

She pointed out that under previous policy, offering lifetime passes and substantial discounts to seniors and the disabled was a way of honoring their contributions to our nation and ensuring them access to the benefits of outdoor recreation. “I guess that’s out the window now,” she said. “No more special honors, no more special breaks. Pay up or stay home now applies to everyone.”

Sequoia National Forest Supervisor Tina Terrell did not respond to the Sun’s request for comment on the proposed changes. The public comment period ends Feb. 1. Comments can be submitted at www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#submitComment?R=0900006480a60f36. Congressional contact information can be found at www.senate.gov and www.house.gov.

Comments

19 comment(s)

    Susan White wrote on Jan 3, 2010 2:22 PM:

    " What the USFS is doing is UNCONSITUTIONAL All the Forests were set aside FOR The People and all of our Generations, The USFS has a Habit of writing rules and regulations without congress approval. The Laws set by Congress are laws, of which superceed any Rule or Regulation, And they will continue to do so until We the People stop them.
    Also be aware that most of our National Lands have been put under the UN Bio deversity Programs, your Social Security money is paying the USFS, everytime they get a raise your social security is robbed !! "

    Trey wrote on Dec 28, 2009 6:15 PM:

    " I want to apologize to Tina Terrell for my post that contained unkind personal comments. While I stand by my belief that she is in a job that might be too big of a responsibility, the unkind comments were unjustified. In fact, violated the rules of the forum here at KV Sun.

    Editiors, please remove my previous post if that is not asking too much. However, I would like my apology to appear. "

    Voice of Authority wrote on Dec 28, 2009 1:35 PM:

    " Obnoxious comments about our Forest Service and Ms. TT may be uncalled for but that does not make them any less true. Someone involved way over the scope of her expertise. And I happen to know her and backup any negativity expressed. Yes, why should she help us? Because it is her JOB to do so. HUH? "

    Voice of Reason wrote on Dec 28, 2009 8:35 AM:

    " The obnoxious comment about Tina Terrell is uncalled for. Some of you are reaping what you sow. Why should she help you? By the way, the FLREA does NOT say that day areas MUST be included. At best, it says that all included areas at the time of issuance must be included for the rest of the issued year. "

    Bob wrote on Dec 17, 2009 12:46 PM:

    " Well, what did anyone expect? A break from the government.........yeah, right. "

    Trey wrote on Dec 17, 2009 6:28 AM:

    " Resistance Now: Interesting, I do not recall ever stating my political viewpoints, at least not overtly.

    Your paranoia is self-evident so I am happy to hear you are pleased with it.

    The very things that have been destroyed were on their way to destruction long before the current president. We had eight years of the wimp and four years of the man who spawned him. "

    Mac wrote on Dec 16, 2009 11:45 AM:

    " It sounds like somebody needs to relax and get a hobby. "

    Resistance Now wrote on Dec 16, 2009 12:24 AM:

    " Peter, have you seen any court rooms or judges that are not "far left?" If the "right" started today to remedy changes, it would take all the court rooms in America at least 10 years to take back what Obama or his Czars have destroyed! And yes, Trey, you may call me paranoid, because I don't trust any "Progressives or Obamacrats"...and yes, I will remain that way, while watching you "Obama lemmings" walk into the ovens! This is reality! Wake Up! "

    annonomys wrote on Dec 15, 2009 4:53 PM:

    " how about this one....what has obama done that has been good?? i cant think of anything "

    Peter wrote on Dec 15, 2009 9:07 AM:

    " The law (FLREA) expressly states that all holders of National Recreation Passes (Seniors and Disabled included) must be granted entrance to day-use areas with those passes at no additional charge. By instituting a fee on these two groups the Forest Service is unilaterally violating the law. Unless somebody takes this court, or Congress acts, the Forest Service will -again- get away with violating the law. "

    Trey wrote on Dec 13, 2009 11:05 AM:

    " It is ironic that seniors are the group targeted, especially since the majority of seniors have limited finances. Factor into this group the veterans who faithfully served this country -- it does not make sense.

    To Resistance Now: Just because you are paranoid does not mean that they are not out to get YOU. Keep your eyes open :-) "

    local wrote on Dec 12, 2009 5:07 PM:

    " Hello Barbara (resistance now and maybe annomomys with horrible spelling) Knew you would be back talking crazy. If I'm wrong I apoligize. Whoever you are, get therapy as paranioa can be treated.

    considerig what Obama inherited, what has he done so bad? Really can you back anything up with hard facts or just Fox views(news) jibberish? "

    annonomys wrote on Dec 12, 2009 12:08 AM:

    " ya know it was once said that, if your government doesnt work anymore START A NEW ONE!!!!! AND FOLKS....I THINK ITS TIME TO START A NEW GOVERNMENT...obama has done nothing to help this country except to put it deeper in debt, he has done EVERYTHING he said he WASN'T going to do...funny how the people who put their lives on the line for this country, are treated like yesterday's garbage, but yet everyone who comes here illegally has, brand new cars, boats, houses, while are veterns live in boxes, under bridges etc...wake up already! "

    Say What wrote on Dec 11, 2009 10:58 PM:

    " I'm sorry RESISTANCE NOW, but I'm afraid that Jack Daniels on your Cheerios is NOT a good breakfast, at least for you.

    You cannot really believe that the government has a plan to keep veterans out of parks to make the veterans easy to round up? Can you? "

    Mac wrote on Dec 11, 2009 10:51 PM:

    " Seriously? O_o "

    Resistance Now wrote on Dec 11, 2009 1:38 PM:

    " If Veterans and disabled are allowed access to camps and parks and wilderness areas in the USA, they cannot "be rounded up quickly, or kept track of"--a long time ago the government started working out a program to "cluster people" to enable control over the masses, you are just becoming aware of the start of the "One World Order" which will control all who resist. Remember, the Jews stood in line peacefully to be herded into the boxcars that took them to the assassination camps. WISE-UP AMERICANS! "

    patrick thomas wrote on Dec 10, 2009 7:58 AM:

    " I spent 21 years of my life serving this country. I am 100 percent disablyed and this is what happens? Someone who never spent any time in the military makes this decision. Let them try and make do on what my wife and i have. Just another reason to get out of this state. "

    Weekender wrote on Dec 9, 2009 11:52 PM:

    " What's the cost of the pass? I haven't had one for YEARS, since I never have the free time to go to parks. I too busy working to pay all the TAXES that the FEDS and STATE suck from me. "

    David Dills wrote on Dec 9, 2009 12:15 PM:

    " Apparently a large portion of the Country no longer cares to show respect to Seniors or concern for the Disabled.They paid the taxes that saved those lands, but apparently the poor economy, the fact of fixed income, and other factors are of no concern to those that would take away the Senior and Disabled discount passes. I cannot understand the drive to keep the very people whose taxes paid for the land, out of it. From excessive admission fees to extremist demands for Wilderness Areas, the fight to lock the public out continues. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive, off-topic, repetitious and/or redundant content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   


Multimedia


Voices of the Valley

Kern Valley Sun

Classifieds

Contact us: 760 379 3667
Click for Lake Isabella, California Forecast