Fuller bill protecting children clears hurdle


Published on Tuesday, July 13, 2010 10:15 PM PDT

Dana Culhane
Special to the Sun

Legislation by Assemblymember Jean Fuller, R-Bakersfield, to protect children from a parent or guardian who is using an illegal hallucinogen passed the State Senate Public Safety Committee yesterday, on yet another overwhelmingly bipartisan vote.

Assembly Bill 2410, authored by Fuller and co-authored by Sen. Dean Florez, D-Bakersfield, was introduced in response to the local case of Angel Vidal Mendoza, Sr. In May 2009, Mendoza was arrested under suspicion of biting his 4-year-old son’s eyeballs while being under the influence of PCP. In prior criminal case in 2006, he had been charged with being under the influence of PCP but plead no contest to child endangerment charges. Unfortunately, he was able to regain custody of his son after his arrest, putting his son at risk of future injury.

Fuller’s legislation will give local law enforcement and child protective services the tools they need to respond to cases where a parent used a hallucinogen like meth, cocaine or PCP in the same way they would respond to the use of a narcotic. Under the measure, they would be empowered to shelter children from a parent or guardian who is under the influence of a hallucinogen and in imminent danger in their care.

“No child should ever have to suffer like Angel Mendoza, Jr. has had to suffer, the result of a senseless attack by an irresponsible parent who was abusing a dangerous hallucinogen,” said Fuller. “My legislation will ensure that local law enforcement can step in when they see a case like the Mendoza case and protect our kids from an out-of-control parent whose self-destructive actions threaten both themselves and their families.”

The measure now goes to the State Senate floor for consideration.

Assemblymember Fuller represents the 32nd Assembly District, which includes Bakersfield, Ridgecrest, Tehachapi, Taft, Kern River Valley and the Frazier Mountain communities.

Comments

2 comment(s)

    whatever wrote on Jul 8, 2010 9:09 PM:

    " The problem is can the state handle the burden of every child in home with drug addicted parents? Drug addiction is a huge problem in our state and alone has never been considered reason enough to take a child away. I don't know what the solution is but taking thousands probably hundred thousands of children out of their homes is a huge burden on an already faulty system. Like I said, I don't know the solution but this is a start "

    Rek wrote on Jul 8, 2010 11:55 AM:

    " Maybe I'm misinformed due to my lack of experience with these substances, but since when are meth and cocaine hallucinogens?

    Furthermore, why target hallucinogens specifically? That just leaves loopholes. A parent under the influence of any substance for recreational purposes is not in a condition to be responsible for the welfare of anything, especially a child. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive, off-topic, repetitious and/or redundant content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   


Multimedia


Bull Fire

Kern Valley Sun

Classifieds

Contact us: 760 379 3667
Click for Lake Isabella, California Forecast